FAST FACTS

A facility is considered an “institution” by the federal government if it has 4 or more beds.

About 12% of children, ages 5-17 (6.1 million)(1), have difficulty performing one or more everyday activities related to learning, communication, mobility and self-care. About 0.9% of these children (459,000)(1) have difficulty with self-care and are likely to need long term care
assistance. Boys are almost twice as likely to have difficulty performing everyday activities than girls are.(1)

2001 Facts:

Number of individuals residing in nursing homes: 1.45 million (2)
Patients with MR in Nursing Homes: 41,338 (2.84%) (2)
Number of Residents in MRDD facilities: 105,380 (2)
ICFs/MRDD Facilities: 6,486 6,486 (2)
ICFs/MRDD Total Beds: 124,748 (2)

Age Distribution for Persons with MR and/or DD Population (3)

  • Under age 17   59%
  • Age 17-64       38%
  • Age 65+          03%

2001 Selected Client Characteristics for ICFs/MRDD (2)
Client characteristics are not mutually exclusive.

Characteristics Number Percent
Age:
   

Under 22

9,013 8.6%

22-45

54,461 51.7%

46-65

35,018 33.2%

66+

6,888 6.5%
Mild MR 13,858 13.2%
Moderate MR 16,883 16.0%
Severe MR 23,251 22.1%
Profound MR 49,439 46.9%
Autism 7,603 7.2%
Cerebral Palsy 21,606 21.6%
Epilepsy Controlled 33,258 31.6%
Epilepsy Uncontrolled 8,344 7.9%
Speech/Language Impairment 59,339 56.3%
Hearing Impaired 13,406 12.7%
Visual Impaired 32,612 30.9%
Drugs to control Behavior 41,269 39.2%
Physical Restraints 8,852 8.4%
Off-campus Day Program 51,749 49.1%

Distribution of Persons with MR and/or DD in Residence Size (4)

There has been a dramatic decline in the number of children with MR/DD who receive care in large institutions (16 or more beds) and a shift toward care in smaller residences.

  1-6 Residents 7-15 Residents 16+ Residents
1987 27.4% 19.0% 53.6%
1998 58.8% 15.7% 25.6%
Total Residents: 1987--255,637; 1998--344,162.

The Medicaid program is the most important program for people with mental retardation and/or developmental disabilities.

Medicaid Funding for Home and Community-Based (HCB) Services (5)

Historically, Medicaid long term care expenditures have financed services delivered in nursing homes, ICFs/MR and other institutions, but the proportion of spending directed to home and
community-based care has increased steadily over the past decade. Medicaid spending on home and community-based services was about $18 billion (27%) of the $68 billion spent on long term care in fiscal year 2000. The primary means by which states provide home and community-
based services is through an optional approach called home and community based services waivers. States must apply to the federal government for these waivers.

HCB Waivers/Medicaid Spending by Group (6)

  • MR and/or DD             76.7%
  • Aged and Disabled       21.3%
  • Other                             2.0%

Trends in Medicaid LTC Spending for Institutional and HCB Care, 1990-2001 (7)

  Total Spending
FY 1990
Total Spending
FY 2001
HCB Care $ 3.9 Billion $22.7 Billion
Institutional Care
(NFs & ICFs/MR)
$25.6 Billion $54.0 Billion
Totals: $29.5B $76.7B

2001 Medicaid Spending for HCB Services (7)

  • Home Health            $ 2.6B
  • Personal Care          $ 5.3B
  • HCB Waivers         $14.9B

2001 Medicaid Spending for Institutional Care (7)

  • Nursing Facilities         $43.4B
  • ICFs/MRDD private    $ 6.5B
  • ICFs/MRDD public      $ 4.1B

The proportion of Medicaid long term care spending devoted to HCB services varies widely among states. For example, in 2001, 11 states devoted 40% or more of Medicaid long term care
expenditures to community-based care; 30 states devoted 20% to 39% and 9 states and the District of Columbia devoted less than 20%. (7)


1. America’s Children: Key National Indicator of Well-Being, Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, 1999 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,” The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000.

2. OSCAR-MRDD 10/2002 (HSRE/KJD)

3. S.A. Larson and L. Anderson, Excerpts from an Analysis of the 1994 and 1995 NHIS-DS, Research and Training Center on Community Living, University of Minnesota, 2000 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,” P. 30, The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000.

4. R.Prouty et al., Residential Services for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: Status and Trends through 1998, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, May 1999 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,” The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000.

5. HHS, HCFA, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group, Personal Health Care Expenditures, 2001, as reported in “Long Term Care: Implications of Supreme Court’s Olmstead Decision Are Still Unfolding,” Testimony Submitted to the Senate Special Committee on Aging, September 24, 2001.

6. Harrington et al. 1915 © Medicaid Home and Community Based Waiver Participants, Services and Expenditures, 1992-1997 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending, The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000.

7. MEDSTAT Group, from HCFA Form 64 Data

8. CMS Form 64 (HSRE/KJD)

Home
Individuals
Residential Services
   
AHCA