![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAST FACTSA facility is considered an “institution” by the federal government if it has 4 or more beds. About 12% of children, ages 5-17 (6.1 million)(1), have
difficulty performing one or more everyday activities related to learning,
communication, mobility and self-care. About 0.9% of these children (459,000)(1)
have difficulty with self-care and are likely to need long term care 2001 Facts:
Age Distribution for Persons with MR and/or DD Population (3)
2001 Selected Client Characteristics for ICFs/MRDD (2)
Distribution of Persons with MR and/or DD in Residence Size (4) There has been a dramatic decline in the number of children with MR/DD who receive care in large institutions (16 or more beds) and a shift toward care in smaller residences.
The Medicaid program is the most important program for people with mental retardation and/or developmental disabilities. Medicaid Funding for Home and Community-Based (HCB) Services (5) Historically, Medicaid long term care expenditures have financed services
delivered in nursing homes, ICFs/MR and other institutions, but the proportion
of spending directed to home and HCB Waivers/Medicaid Spending by Group (6)
Trends in Medicaid LTC Spending for Institutional and HCB Care, 1990-2001 (7)
2001 Medicaid Spending for HCB Services (7)
2001 Medicaid Spending for Institutional Care (7)
The proportion of Medicaid long term care spending devoted to HCB services
varies widely among states. For example, in 2001, 11 states devoted 40%
or more of Medicaid long term care
1. America’s Children: Key National Indicator of Well-Being,
Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, 1999 as reported
in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,”
The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000. 3. S.A. Larson and L. Anderson, Excerpts from an Analysis of the 1994 and 1995 NHIS-DS, Research and Training Center on Community Living, University of Minnesota, 2000 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,” P. 30, The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000. 4. R.Prouty et al., Residential Services for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: Status and Trends through 1998, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, May 1999 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending,” The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000. 5. HHS, HCFA, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group, Personal Health Care Expenditures, 2001, as reported in “Long Term Care: Implications of Supreme Court’s Olmstead Decision Are Still Unfolding,” Testimony Submitted to the Senate Special Committee on Aging, September 24, 2001. 6. Harrington et al. 1915 © Medicaid Home and Community Based Waiver Participants, Services and Expenditures, 1992-1997 as reported in “Long-Term Care Chart Book: Persons Served, Payors and Spending, The Urban Institute, May 5, 2000. 7. MEDSTAT Group, from HCFA Form 64 Data 8. CMS Form 64 (HSRE/KJD) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||